Skip to content
Unlimited, exam-realistic practice

The LSAT practice that never runs out — and never stops teaching.

Counsel generates an endless supply of LSAT-style Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension questions, explains every answer in depth, and adapts to exactly what you keep getting wrong.

Start practicing freeSee a sample question

Free while we're in early access — no card required. Original LSAT-style questions, not reused exam content.

Built to fix what every other prep tool gets wrong

Never run out of questions

Other courses recycle a few thousand questions you eventually memorize. Counsel generates fresh, exam-calibrated questions on demand — validated so each has exactly one defensible answer.

Explanations that actually teach

Every question comes with a full breakdown — why the right answer is right and why each wrong answer is a trap — written to the standard of the best human tutors.

Training personalized to you

Counsel tracks the exact question types and traps you miss and serves you the next-best question to close the gap.

A question you'd swear came from the real thing

Here's an original Counsel-generated Logical Reasoning item — answers revealed so you can see how feedback works.

Logical ReasoningFlawMedium

The city's bike-share program was introduced last spring. Since then, the number of cycling injuries reported at area hospitals has risen by 30 percent. Clearly, the bike-share program has made cycling more dangerous in the city.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

  • Atakes for granted that a rise in the number of reported injuries reflects a higher rate of injury, rather than simply more people cycling.Correct answer
  • Bpresumes, without justification, that the bike-share program was the only change to affect cyclists last spring.Incorrect
  • Crelies on hospital reports that may fail to count injuries treated elsewhere.
  • Dfails to specify precisely what is to count as a “cycling injury.”
  • Edraws a conclusion about all cyclists from evidence about only those who were injured.
Correct answer: A

The argument confuses the number of injuries with the rate of injury. If the bike-share program put far more cyclists on the road, total injuries can rise even if cycling became no more dangerous per rider.

Hint: compare “how many” vs “how often” AI tutor — coming soon
Free during early access

Simple pricing. Serious results.

Everything is free while we're in early access — no card, no charge. Here's what the plans will cost when paid tiers launch.

Planned:$19–$99/mo
Start freeSee all plans

Counsel provides original LSAT-style practice and is not affiliated with or endorsed by LSAC.